Zeer
ChiriChiri buying intent
6 tracked signals — top 6 topics below.
Attention by team
taxonomy_intent_rollup × social_profile.roleEvery tracked signal from a Chiri employee, placed by the team they sit in and the theme they engaged with. Darker means more concentrated attention.
Topics being researched
30-day windowAll tracked topics, ranked by signal volume. Confidence is the classifier's certainty that the signal belongs to this topic.
18d ago
18d ago
18d ago
18d ago
18d ago
18d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Top accounts researching Chiri
names withheld on the public pageCompanies whose people mention Chiri in their own activity. Account names are withheld here; not yet classified as implementation partner vs. genuine prospective buyer.
No buyer signal yet for this account
Nobody in the graph is currently discussing this company by name in a way we can attribute to a specific employer.
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityHow big those accounts are, and who inside them is senior enough to matter. Competitor products still not yet computed for this account.
What's been said
public posts mentioning ChiriReal public activity that surfaced Chiri in a tracked topic. Not a sentiment score — just what people actually wrote.
"That's disgusting." That's what my CTO said when I told him the stat, and I agree. The stat is this: According to the WSJ, a recent survey of 100 large companies by Guggenheim Securities found 77% are now using AI agents but only 4% have secured them. That's disgusting. And terrifying. But it doesn't have to be that way. Think about what that actually means for a second. Agents. Not chatbots, agents, that can read your files, send messages on your behalf, pull customer data, execute multi-step workflows across your systems. 77 out of 100 companies said "yeah, we're running those." 4 out of 100 said "yeah, we locked them down." That's not a gap. That's a house with no doors and a sign that says "come on in." And look, I'm not anti-agent. I'm wildly pro-agent. We build agent infrastructure at Chiri. I use agents. They're incredible when they work right. But "when they work right" is doing a LOT of heavy lifting in that sentence. Here's what most companies are missing: You don't just need agents. You need to know what they did. What data they touched. What tools they used. What decisions they made and why. You need a trail. An immutable, searchable, exportable trail. Not "we'll figure out logging later." Now. This is why we built Chiri Brain the way we did. Every interaction produces an execution trace. Not a summary, a full trace. What data was retrieved, what tools ran, what guardrails were applied, which model was used, step by step. PII detection that catches sensitive data before an agent processes it. Not after. Hybrid RBAC + ABAC access control with tenant isolation. Task Personas that enforce what an agent can and can't do. Versioned, auditable, with guardrail constraints baked in. Think of it like giving every agent a job description AND a compliance officer. Multi-model flexibility so you're not locked into one vendor's risk profile. Switch models mid-conversation. Run them in parallel with Council Mode. The point isn't the feature list. The point is this: security isn't the thing that slows agents down. It's the thing that lets you actually use them. With confidence. At scale. Without losing sleep. 73 out of 100 companies are running agents with no guardrails. I don't want to be in that 73. I'm guessing you don't either. Don't be disgusting. (I mean that in the nicest possible way.)