Groq buying intent
16 tracked signals — top 7 topics below — Engineering and Sales are carrying most of it.
Attention by team
taxonomy_intent_rollup × social_profile.roleEvery tracked signal from a Groq employee, placed by the team they sit in and the theme they engaged with. Darker means more concentrated attention.
Topics being researched
30-day windowAll tracked topics, ranked by signal volume. Confidence is the classifier's certainty that the signal belongs to this topic.
10d ago
10d ago
10d ago
10d ago
10d ago
10d ago
10d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Who to contact at Groq
verified title on filePeople at Groq whose own activity produced these signals. Names are withheld pending a consent decision; titles, seniority and topic are real and free to browse.
Top accounts researching Groq
names withheld on the public pageCompanies whose people mention Groq in their own activity. Account names are withheld here; not yet classified as implementation partner vs. genuine prospective buyer.
No buyer signal yet for this account
Nobody in the graph is currently discussing this company by name in a way we can attribute to a specific employer.
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityHow big those accounts are, and who inside them is senior enough to matter. Competitor products still not yet computed for this account.
What's been said
public posts mentioning GroqReal public activity that surfaced Groq in a tracked topic. Not a sentiment score — just what people actually wrote.
Spent the last month in the US. Saw up close what the team that moved from Groq into Nvidia have been building. It's serious. They've compressed our roadmap from years into months. Honestly, it blew my mind. And it reminded me why our story was never just about a chip. The inference race is not the training race. Different economics. Different architecture. Different rules. What customers actually need is a system not a component, not a cloud, not a token API. A system. Global fabric. Enterprise-grade isolation. The ability to bring their own stack and run it on infrastructure built specifically for inference at scale. No one has assembled that. Yet. The market is moving toward GW scale inference. The companies that get there first with the right architecture, the right economics, and the right footprint already in the ground won't just run inference for the AI era. They'll set the terms for what it costs. More soon. A lot more.
Connecting Groq API for lightning-fast inference
Why Groq Feels Like Cheating - DEV Community I've been building a multi-agent LangGraph pipeline recently, and like most people stitching together free-tier LLM providers, I ended up comparing Groq against the usual suspects. The difference wasn't subtle. Other providers felt like a normal API call — you send a request, you wait, text streams back at a pace you've gotten used to. Groq felt like ch
Why Groq Feels Like Cheating - DEV CommunityGroq — Deep Dive - DEV Community Posted on Aug 21 • Originally published at github.com # Groq — Deep Dive The narrative of the AI hardware wars has shifted dramatically in the last twelve months. Once touted as the "Nvidia Killer" with its revolutionary Language Processing Units (LPUs), Groq has undergone one of the most significant strategic pivots in Silicon Valley history. Today, we are looking
Groq — Deep Dive - DEV CommunityHow good is Groq?. LLM inference on groq.com would costs… | by Balazs Kocsis | Medium Sign up Member-only story # How good is Groq? 2 min read Aug 7, 2024 -- Share LLM inference on groq.com would costs about 10 times less, compared to OpenAI’s pricing for GPT-4o Press enter or click to view image in full size Source screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UzW_AGX68g&t=15s Ultra fast respo
How good is Groq?. LLM inference on groq.com would costs… | by Balazs Kocsis | Medium