HiveGPT ( a Social27 company) buying intent
9 tracked signals — top 4 topics below.
Attention by team
taxonomy_intent_rollup × social_profile.roleEvery tracked signal from a HiveGPT ( a Social27 company) employee, placed by the team they sit in and the theme they engaged with. Darker means more concentrated attention.
Topics being researched
30-day windowAll tracked topics, ranked by signal volume. Confidence is the classifier's certainty that the signal belongs to this topic.
4d ago
22d ago
22d ago
8d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Who to contact at HiveGPT ( a Social27 company)
verified title on filePeople at HiveGPT ( a Social27 company) whose own activity produced these signals. Names are withheld pending a consent decision; titles, seniority and topic are real and free to browse.
Top accounts researching HiveGPT ( a Social27 company)
names withheld on the public pageCompanies whose people mention HiveGPT ( a Social27 company) in their own activity. Account names are withheld here; not yet classified as implementation partner vs. genuine prospective buyer.
No buyer signal yet for this account
Nobody in the graph is currently discussing this company by name in a way we can attribute to a specific employer.
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityHow big those accounts are, and who inside them is senior enough to matter. Competitor products still not yet computed for this account.
What's been said
public posts mentioning HiveGPT ( a Social27 company)Real public activity that surfaced HiveGPT ( a Social27 company) in a tracked topic. Not a sentiment score — just what people actually wrote.
Every voice AI demo works. None of them survive production. I built one on PolyAI's stack last week, the same one running Foot Locker, Marriott and UniCredit and watched it actually hold up under real calls. So I went and read the code to figure out what they did differently. 89% of agent prototypes never reach production. Agents drift, maintenance debt piles up, edge cases never get caught. I have watched the pattern across a dozen companies. What I found is one of the few voice AI companies that is not an LLM wrapper. They own the whole pipeline. ASR (Owl), LLM (Raven), TTS — all proprietary. Raven runs sub-300ms on live calls. Generic LLMs struggle to. There are two doors into the platform. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗼-𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗿 - Poly Agent Builder → Pointed Poly Agent Builder at my company website → It scraped FAQs, pricing, policies on its own → Knowledge base, voice, integrations configured → Live WebRTC agent. Eight minutes start to finish No telephony stack. No CCaaS contract. The website is now the phone line. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗼𝗼𝗿 - 𝗔𝗗𝗞 Same platform. Different door. ADK puts voice agents in my IDE. Cursor, VS Code, or Claude Code generates the logic. Git, CI, version control. Build from spreadsheets, APIs, or diagrams. The agentic part: ADK connects to monitoring tools and automated QA pipelines. Failure modes get classified. Variants get tested. Winning ones ship. While I sleep. This is the first voice platform I have tested where reliability does not trade off against capability. If you build voice or agentic systems, watch the video below. First two months are free if you sign up today at studio.poly.ai PS → Building agentic systems? Drop "loop" below for the eval framework I run. #Ad #PolyAIPartner