JMP
Buying intent
88 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Engineering and Sales are carrying most of it.
Attention by team
LinkedIn activity, by teamWhere JMP's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.
Topics being researched
30-day windowEvery tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.
12d ago
10d ago
12d ago
5d ago
12d ago
12d ago
10d ago
15d ago
12d ago
8d ago
30d ago
10d ago
26d ago
4d ago
15d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Who's active at JMP
verified title on fileTitles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.
See everyone, not just the first 10
28 people across every department at JMP, plus a LinkedIn profile link for each.
Primary products / business lines
LinkedIn company profileGreat software in the right hands can change the world. We’ve seen it. You may have too. JMP products are behind many of the world’s greatest green-energy technologies, pharmaceutical breakthroughs, and high-tech improvements. For 30-plus years, JMP statistical software products have helped users see data clearly. It’s spelled J-M-P but pronounced “jump,” suggesting a leap in interactivity, a m
New capability sought
Employee posts (LinkedIn)Process Improvement; Professional Development; Agentic AI System; Data Visualization; Machine Learning; Medical Devices; Predictive Modeling; Process Control
Top accounts researching JMP
names withheld on the public pageThese are companies whose own people brought up JMP unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.
129,094 companies · 649,540 people are researching Artificial Intelligence
JMP's own team shows 13 signals on this topic. No one outside JMP has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.
- Data Science7,226 cos · 35,318 people
- Data Analytics6,839 cos · 34,174 people
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityCompany size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.
Buying committee functions
Employee job titles (LinkedIn)Sales — 8 people; Engineering — 8 people; Marketing — 2 people; Data / Analytics — 1 person; Finance — 1 person; HR / Talent — 1 person
What's been said
public posts by JMP's teamNo public post naming JMP has surfaced in the past year, so this is what JMP's own team is posting about publicly — their topics, in their words.
One challenge I kept hearing from customers at a recent JMP event was that even with plenty of data we often struggle to clearly understand how complex systems behave when variables start interacting with each other. That’s where modeling and visualization can make a real difference. Instead of only reviewing outputs after the fact, predictive modeling helps teams explore relationships, test “what if” scenarios, and make decisions with greater confidence before moving forward. I recently watched this on-demand session demonstrating how modeling tools – including the Prediction Profiler – can help make complex, noisy, or time-dependent processes easier to interpret and communicate. Worth a watch if you’re looking to move from raw data toward faster, clearer decision-making. Curious how others are approaching this: Are you leaning more on predictive models to guide decisions, or still evaluating outputs case by case? #PredictiveAnalytics #MachineLearning https://lnkd.in/gqHzcphJ
May 2026I’ll be speaking at SEMI Americas Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference this week. My session, “Hybrid Experimentation: Improving the Efficiency of Bayesian Optimization with Definitive Screening Designs,” will focus on practical ways to: Get more insight from fewer experiments Combine structured DOE with adaptive optimization Reduce guesswork in complex process development 📍Hilton Albany - Governor AB 🕒 May 13 at 2:40 pm If you’re attending, I’d enjoy connecting. Feel free to stop by or reach out.
May 2026Looking forward to SEMI Americas Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference this year. It’s always a great opportunity to step away from day-to-day work and connect with others tackling similar challenges in semiconductor process development and optimization. I’ll be presenting “Hybrid Experimentation: Improving the Efficiency of Bayesian Optimization with Definitive Screening Designs,” where I’ll share some practical approaches to getting more insight from fewer experiments. If you’re planning to be there, I’d really enjoy catching up - whether during the session or in between talks. Hope to see some familiar faces (and meet a few new ones as well). https://lnkd.in/g43UVqiK
Apr 2026QUIZ TIME: Which of these Screen Sizes should the team stop using? Let me know in the comments. I made this graph in 20 seconds and only used drag and drop functions of JMP to align the data. Unless an AI starts reading my mind, I could not have been faster. This is why we are putting on a 2 day workshop on the 28th and 29th of April to show you how to do visualisation with JMP. Registration is free and there is genuinely a lot of great stuff to learn! The event will be held by Ben Barroso-Ingham and Spyros Megalou , who are two of our very own data wizards. Sign up here or pm me for more information: https://lnkd.in/d_rRC-WJ If you need JMP for the workshop, I am also happy to give you a free trial! #JMP #datavisualisation #analytics #statistics #biotech #manufacturing
Apr 2026Today it's #InternationalBookDay , but for those of us from Catalonia, it’s also one of the most meaningful cultural traditions of the year: Sant Jordi. A day filled with books, roses, and the joy of sharing stories. Just like the tradition of exchanging books and roses, our JMP Book Club brings people together through shared learning and curiosity. 📘🌹 Want to take a look or join the conversation? Here’s the link: https://lnkd.in/dHfDpZUS Feliç Sant Jordi! Anne Milley , Di Michelson , Maria Lanzerath , Gail Massari , Luiza Fabreti, PhD , Natalie Starkey
Apr 2026I'm working on lots of new mandates, so if you are currently open to new opportunities...lets chat! And if you don't want to chat, then scroll through my postings here and hit me up if you're interested in hearing more about any of them. Please keep in mind, these are all Montreal based opportunities (except for one NY based Sales position), so if you live outside of Canada please scroll on.
Apr 2026Working with scientists and engineers across industries for several years, I see very clearly what benefits Smart Experimentation methods promise and deliver. Software and algorithm are rarely the problem. The challenge rather comes from real world characteristics, which prohibit simple one-tool-solves-it-all solutions. More so, it’s down to the right toolset, and culture. From my experience, four domains need to be navigated in order to effectively deploy smart experimentation methods. I call them the 4 P's - and I presented this framework at the JMP Discovery Summit Europe last month. Here’s a brief summary: Purpose. What is the actual goal? BayesOpt is purpose-built to reach a defined optimum fast. If the goal is "understand the process" rather than "find the best conditions," it's the wrong primary tool. A thorough consideration of “What do we want” is important. Prior. What data already exists? DOE is the perfect match if starting from nothing. BayesOpt with no prior data will spend its first few runs collecting information before it starts optimising. BayesOpt seeded with a well-designed DOE - or even messy historical data - converges far faster. The quality of what you put in directly determines the speed you get out. Problems. What are the constraints? Factor constraints, execution limits, process variability, shifting project scope - these don't disappear when you change the algorithm. But BayesOpt handles them differently from DOE (half a DOE is pretty worthless). And BayesOpt is more agnostic to the true shape of the relationship, and it navigates constrained spaces that classical designs may struggle with. People. Who is running this, and what do they expect? We cannot change how people feel about things like statistically designed experiments or gaussian process models, but we can use different tools for similar tasks helping people overcome their hurdles and start using smart experimentation methods. People are THE central part if companies try to achieve a cultural shift and transform industrial experimentation. I am humbled by the feedback I got after my talk – it confirmed how similar the challenges are companies are facing these days. I’d love to continue the conversations - Which of these four do you think causes the most friction in your context? #bayesianoptimization #smartexperimentation #R &D #chemicalindustry #experimentaldesign #processoptimization #innovation #leadership #JMP (Again, thanks to Florence Kussener :))
Apr 2026Lay-offs, missed quota, becoming irrelevant in a crowded, AI-hyped market. Common fears among sales people right now. Not so at JMP. Join a winning team and apply for this Account Executive role if you are UK or Denmark based: https://lnkd.in/dmnSauh6 Danielle Rogers Hadley Myers Willem Clow Emmanuel ROMEU #Sales #Job #JobOffer #Hiring
Apr 2026