Knobbe Martens
Buying intent
18 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below.
Attention by team
LinkedIn activity, by teamWhere Knobbe Martens's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.
Topics being researched
30-day windowEvery tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.
10d ago
6d ago
6d ago
14d ago
18d ago
12d ago
26d ago
12d ago
10d ago
10d ago
12d ago
10d ago
18d ago
26d ago
8d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Who's active at Knobbe Martens
verified title on fileTitles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.
Primary products / business lines
LinkedIn company profileKnobbe Martens protects the ideas that drive innovation and propel our world forward. As a leading intellectual property and technology law firm, clients worldwide rely on us to safeguard their products, brands, and technologies through strategic counsel and high-impact litigation. With offices across the U.S., our lawyers and technology specialists collaborate to deliver tailored solutions for cli
Top accounts researching Knobbe Martens
names withheld on the public pageThese are companies whose own people brought up Knobbe Martens unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.
30,876 companies · 191,941 people are researching Professional Development
Knobbe Martens's own team shows 2 signals on this topic. No one outside Knobbe Martens has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.
- Career Development57,400 cos · 377,367 people
- Legal5,007 cos · 15,766 people
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityCompany size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.
Buying committee functions
Employee job titles (LinkedIn)Leadership — 1 person; Finance — 1 person
What's been said
public posts by Knobbe Martens's teamNo public post naming Knobbe Martens has surfaced in the past year, so this is what Knobbe Martens's own team is posting about publicly — their topics, in their words.
Having spent some time going through the Australian Government's 2026 Budget papers, one theme stood out to me. The Budget appears to assume a relatively orderly operating environment at the same time the climate system is signalling elevated volatility risk heading into 2027. And there is no better example of this, than how much spending has been allocated to water. Over the next four years, the Government has allocated $21.1m in new water-related measures, such as water market integrity, Murray-Darling Basin modelling, First Nations water access and ownership, and institutional support functions. All important initiatives. To me, it feels modest relative to both the scale and predictability of the economic risk Australia may be heading into. And that’s a problem, because our climate agencies are increasingly warning of a potential return to El Niño conditions heading into 2027, with some models assigning probabilities of 60-70% for El Niño. El Niño means hotter and drier conditions. Hotter and drier conditions could mean lower agricultural productivity, food price volatility, pressure on hydro generation, industrial water constraints, and all of this adds inflationary pressure. If Treasury modelling identified a foreseeable 60-70% probability of an event that could cause a material disruption to something like energy, national freight or banking stability, with flow-on effects to inflation and productivity, we would likely see more proactive measures. Yet when it comes to climate, nature, and in this instance potential water risk, despite behaving like systemic economic risks, they are often treated as adjacent to economic policy, rather than central to it. Over the coming years, we are going to continue to see disruption from climate change and nature loss. And if we are to mitigate or at the least minimise the impact, we can’t afford to be reactive or operate as if it is business as usual.
May 2026Such an honor to share this recognition with Salima and Jason. Congratulations to them both, and many thanks to the Los Angeles Times for this honor.
Apr 2026