Zeer
Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.imLavender 💜🔮 www.ora.im buying intent
11 tracked signals — top 10 topics below — Marketing is carrying most of it.
Attention by team
taxonomy_intent_rollup × social_profile.roleEvery tracked signal from a Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.im employee, placed by the team they sit in and the theme they engaged with. Darker means more concentrated attention.
Topics being researched
30-day windowAll tracked topics, ranked by signal volume. Confidence is the classifier's certainty that the signal belongs to this topic.
21d ago
28d ago
21d ago
21d ago
21d ago
28d ago
21d ago
28d ago
28d ago
21d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Top accounts researching Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.im
names withheld on the public pageCompanies whose people mention Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.im in their own activity. Account names are withheld here; not yet classified as implementation partner vs. genuine prospective buyer.
No buyer signal yet for this account
Nobody in the graph is currently discussing this company by name in a way we can attribute to a specific employer.
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityHow big those accounts are, and who inside them is senior enough to matter. Competitor products still not yet computed for this account.
What's been said
public posts mentioning Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.imReal public activity that surfaced Lavender 💜🔮 www.ora.im in a tracked topic. Not a sentiment score — just what people actually wrote.
The product lead for internal ai at Ramp PERFECTLY explained why a Centralized > Decentralized AI strategy is the difference between AI Native & wasting Claude's time. If you haven't checked out the article on X, "We Built Every Employee at Ramp Their Own AI Coworker" - this is your sign that you should. They built what they're calling "Glass". It's the actualization of Jack Dorsey essay, "From Hierarchy to Intelligence". You see, I've been trying to explain this to folks... building in Claude is fun. I do it all the time. But, if I build something... how can I make sure everyone has access to what I'm doing/learning etc.? How can I benefit from the connectors, scripts, and skills already built by others? Also... how can I ensure I'm building something that isn't so brittle that I need a write a new script every time I want to run a new workflow? Building AI internally *IS* a product. Having a bunch of Claude spaghetti code floating around is a governance nightmare... it's also just not very efficient. Letting a thousands flowers come to bloom WAS a great strategy when we were still deciding the best way to bring AI to life within our companies. But, with the rise of harnessing ai (think OpenClaw)... this really needs to be a top down initiative. A core AI owner. Department extensions of that AI owner. It's not just GTM engineering. It's back office. It's HR, its finance... its even engineering. Internal AI is a product that creates a differentiated, compounding advantage for you. It's also a dope recruiting tool haha... like do you want to work at the company that's maximizing their use of AI... or their competitor who isn't? The release of most recent Opus model in February was the starting gun. Ramp is doing the best job advertising their progress. We've built a very similar program to Glass internally. It's not as snazzy... we're smaller - doesn't need to be. (We definitely need to add some of the functionality they've built around Dojo to share skills more easily) Ramp is an AI-Native company. I'd argue this is the new standard of excellence. If you're looking to make the shift, I'm happy to share notes. just ping me