Royal Schiphol Group
Buying intent
48 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Engineering and Marketing are carrying most of it.
Attention by team
LinkedIn activity, by teamWhere Royal Schiphol Group's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.
Topics being researched
30-day windowEvery tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.
2d ago
4d ago
26d ago
26d ago
15d ago
2d ago
14d ago
7d ago
today
18d ago
7d ago
10d ago
18d ago
17d ago
19d ago
Need intent for a specific topic or industry?
We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.
Who's active at Royal Schiphol Group
verified title on fileTitles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.
See everyone, not just the first 10
15 people across every department at Royal Schiphol Group, plus a LinkedIn profile link for each.
Primary products / business lines
LinkedIn company profileSchiphol has been a home for world travellers for more than 100 years. Whether you are travelling to a distant holiday destination or flying to that promising business relation, the adventure begins with us. Schiphol is also the place where you come home. Where you embrace your loved ones again and where your family is waiting for you. And we're proud of that. Every day, thousands of people wo
Top accounts researching Royal Schiphol Group
names withheld on the public pageThese are companies whose own people brought up Royal Schiphol Group unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.
129,094 companies · 649,540 people are researching Artificial Intelligence
Royal Schiphol Group's own team shows 14 signals on this topic. No one outside Royal Schiphol Group has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.
- AI Agent Software22,142 cos · 74,480 people
- Pattern Recognition1,198 cos · 2,710 people
Buyer profile
company size · seniorityCompany size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.
Buying committee functions
Employee job titles (LinkedIn)Engineering — 5 people; Security — 2 people; IT — 2 people; Marketing — 1 person; Data / Analytics — 1 person
What's been said
public posts by Royal Schiphol Group's teamNo public post naming Royal Schiphol Group has surfaced in the past year, so this is what Royal Schiphol Group's own team is posting about publicly — their topics, in their words.
Claude Code doesn't listen and doesn't do what it plans. It can generate code, it can make things work but today I found out (after some vibing) the code design was not as promised. The connection protocol was supposed to be swappable, this was a deliberate design principle Claude itself proposed and planned for. Yet the connection protocol was smeared all over the place, not 'pluggable' at all. I then asked it to rewrite the messy code according to Clean Code principles, it tried but ignored code obviously not in line with CC principles because, it later explained, "wasn't biting". I asked it again with more force, but it left this function in the cli.py file (the entrypoint for the app): async def _exchange_hello(url: str, identity: Identity) -> HelloAck: """Open a sync WS, exchange hello/hello_ack, return the ack.""" async with websockets.connect(peer_ws_url(url)) as ws: await ws.send ( encode(Hello(peer_id=identity.peer_id, device_name=identity.device_name)) ) ack = decode(await ws.recv ()) if not isinstance(ack, HelloAck): raise PairError(f"expected hello_ack, got {type(ack).__name__}") return ack Every single line has issues that make this not a candidate for cli.py The cli file should deal with turning command line arguments into actions, not dealing with web-socket realities - even Codex GPT 5.5 didn't see this is a concern until I explicitly pointed to it. What's going on here? Current LLM coding tools are geared towards minimal diffs, per-line review and a strong tendency to avoid creating new files/classes. Perhaps the result of training on millions of Github issues in open source projects? My fourth attempt: I asked Codex to create more classes, but Codex went overboard and created one class too many, a PairingClient which had only one function and invisible from the outside. I have a hard time believing we can SKILL.md ourselves out this kind of behaviour with coding LLMs pre-optimized for minimal diff and both resisting and overshooting when asked to mind design principles. Another concern is my own limitation: I would not be able to verbalise every intuition I have about programming up front. #LLM #Codex #Claude
May 2026Still buzzing from two amazing days at #ECS2026 in Cologne 🇩🇪 last week! This was my very first ECS, and getting to be there as a speaker made it even more special. I’m genuinely proud that I had the chance to present a session at an event like this 🙏 What made these days so memorable was the mix of learning, inspiration, and great conversations. I got to attend some fantastic sessions, including David Lorenzo López talk on Dataverse and Business Central, The Virtual Entity Way. Really cool to see how virtual tables can be used to connect Business Central, Dataverse, and Power Pages in such a smart way 🚀 Charles Sexton session on accessibility in Power Apps was another highlight for me. It was great to see real attention being given to such an important topic. Building accessible applications should never be an afterthought 💯 And ending the event with a session from two Dutch friends, Daniel Laskewitz and Miguel Verweij (also my travel buddy, thanks for the fun trip ❤️ ), was just awesome. It was also great to see that there is still real attention for the power of AI Builder 💪 But as always, events like this are about more than just the sessions. Catching up with familiar faces, meeting new people, sharing ideas, and having great conversations is what makes these community events so valuable. Paul Beck , it was so great to see you again and to talk about all the cool stuff you’re doing with #Playwright ! Huge thanks to everyone who made these two days so much fun. Special thanks to Adis Jugo , Mustafa Toroman ☁ , Thomas Vochten , and the rest of the organizing team for this wonderful event 🙏 Already looking forward to the next one! #ECS2026 #PowerPlatform #PowerApps #Dataverse #PowerPages #Accessibility #AIBuilder #Community
May 2026Shipped a hobby project as OSS: OpenConveyor. I wanted an easy way to kick off AI agents from my phone, or wherever I happen to be, without giving them the run of my laptop or a long-lived service account. I spend many many years working with Kubernetes, and the primitives for this already exist: Jobs, NetworkPolicies, RBAC, projected Secret volumes, Pod Security Standards. The gap was a thin layer that composes them into something you can safely point an agent at. OpenConveyor is that layer. One CRD (Task) describes the agent, the prompt, and explicitly the secrets and hosts it can reach. The controller reconciles it into a hardened, short-lived Job and cleans up after itself. Anything not declared is denied. Timeouts are mandatory, so no forever running agent going haywire. Trigger it from a GitHub issue, Linear ticket, cron, claude code or copilot session with a /conveyor command, or Telegram bot. Any agent image. Any cluster. Apache 2.0, alpha state, written in Go. Links in the comments.
Apr 2026