Zeer Royal Schiphol Group / intent / royal-schiphol-group

Royal Schiphol Group

1001-5000 employees·Schiphol, Netherlands·schiphol.com

Observed, not inferred · updated weekly

Buying intent

48 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Engineering and Marketing are carrying most of it.

31signals · 30 days
32topics tracked
40.91%attributed to a team

Attention by team

LinkedIn activity, by team

Where Royal Schiphol Group's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.

Artificial Intelligence
AI Agent Software
Pattern Recognition
Executive Search
Microsoft (MSFT)
Business Outcomes
Engineering
Medium67% of team Engineering to Artificial Intelligence: Medium, 67% of this team's signals
Low17% of team Engineering to AI Agent Software: Low, 17% of this team's signals
Engineering to Pattern Recognition: no signal
Engineering to Executive Search: no signal
Low17% of team Engineering to Microsoft (MSFT): Low, 17% of this team's signals
Engineering to Business Outcomes: no signal
Marketing
Marketing to Artificial Intelligence: no signal
Marketing to AI Agent Software: no signal
Marketing to Pattern Recognition: no signal
Marketing to Executive Search: no signal
Marketing to Microsoft (MSFT): no signal
Low100% of team Marketing to Business Outcomes: Low, 100% of this team's signals
Operations
Low100% of team Operations to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 100% of this team's signals
Operations to AI Agent Software: no signal
Operations to Pattern Recognition: no signal
Operations to Executive Search: no signal
Operations to Microsoft (MSFT): no signal
Operations to Business Outcomes: no signal
Security
Low100% of team Security to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 100% of this team's signals
Security to AI Agent Software: no signal
Security to Pattern Recognition: no signal
Security to Executive Search: no signal
Security to Microsoft (MSFT): no signal
Security to Business Outcomes: no signal
Others
High62% of team Others to Artificial Intelligence: High, 62% of this team's signals
Low8% of team Others to AI Agent Software: Low, 8% of this team's signals
Low15% of team Others to Pattern Recognition: Low, 15% of this team's signals
Low15% of team Others to Executive Search: Low, 15% of this team's signals
Others to Microsoft (MSFT): no signal
Others to Business Outcomes: no signal
LowMediumHigh·  banded against the busiest pairing on this page

Topics being researched

30-day window

Every tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.

Artificial Intelligence
LinkedIn
High volume
94%
last
2d ago
AI Agent Software
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
4d ago
Pattern Recognition
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
26d ago
Executive Search
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
26d ago
Microsoft (MSFT)
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
15d ago
Business Outcomes
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
2d ago
Risk Management
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
14d ago
Venture Capital (VC)
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
7d ago
Critical Differentiators
LinkedIn
Low volume
80%
last
today
Aerospace
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
18d ago
App Builder
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
7d ago
Microsoft Sentinel
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
10d ago
Asset Management
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
18d ago
Software Developers
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
17d ago
Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
19d ago

Need intent for a specific topic or industry?

We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.

Talk to us

Who's active at Royal Schiphol Group

verified title on file

Titles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.

Engineering6 active
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
researching Software Developers
in
researching Developer Experience
in
researching Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)
in
Others5 active
Leadershipresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
researching AI Agent Software
in
Leadershipresearching Executive Search
in
Data Lead, Infrastructure
researching Executive Search
in
+ 1 more in Others
Marketing2 active
Personal Assistant to Project Director Pier-A Project and Customer Delivery Manager
Directorresearching Business Outcomes
in
marcom lead | marketing communications specialist a.i.
researching Brand Strategy
in
+ 2 more in Marketing
Security1 active
Business Information Security Officer
Leadershipresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
+ 1 more in Security
Operations1 active
project manager system integration
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
+ 1 more in Operations

See everyone, not just the first 10

15 people across every department at Royal Schiphol Group, plus a LinkedIn profile link for each.

Primary products / business lines

LinkedIn company profile

Schiphol has been a home for world travellers for more than 100 years. Whether you are travelling to a distant holiday destination or flying to that promising business relation, the adventure begins with us. Schiphol is also the place where you come home. Where you embrace your loved ones again and where your family is waiting for you. And we're proud of that. Every day, thousands of people wo

Top accounts researching Royal Schiphol Group

names withheld on the public page

These are companies whose own people brought up Royal Schiphol Group unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.

129,094 companies · 649,540 people are researching Artificial Intelligence

Royal Schiphol Group's own team shows 14 signals on this topic. No one outside Royal Schiphol Group has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.

  • AI Agent Software22,142 cos · 74,480 people
  • Pattern Recognition1,198 cos · 2,710 people
Sign up to see which companies →

Buyer profile

company size · seniority

Company size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.

Unlock the buyer profile

Company-size breakdown and buyer seniority mix for accounts researching Royal Schiphol Group.

Company size breakdown
Buyer seniority mix

Sign up to learn more

Create an account to explore buyer insights as they become available.

Sign up to learn more →

Buying committee functions

Employee job titles (LinkedIn)

Engineering — 5 people; Security — 2 people; IT — 2 people; Marketing — 1 person; Data / Analytics — 1 person

What's been said

public posts by Royal Schiphol Group's team

No public post naming Royal Schiphol Group has surfaced in the past year, so this is what Royal Schiphol Group's own team is posting about publicly — their topics, in their words.

LinkedIn

Claude Code doesn't listen and doesn't do what it plans. It can generate code, it can make things work but today I found out (after some vibing) the code design was not as promised. The connection protocol was supposed to be swappable, this was a deliberate design principle Claude itself proposed and planned for. Yet the connection protocol was smeared all over the place, not 'pluggable' at all. I then asked it to rewrite the messy code according to Clean Code principles, it tried but ignored code obviously not in line with CC principles because, it later explained, "wasn't biting". I asked it again with more force, but it left this function in the cli.py file (the entrypoint for the app): async def _exchange_hello(url: str, identity: Identity) -> HelloAck: """Open a sync WS, exchange hello/hello_ack, return the ack.""" async with websockets.connect(peer_ws_url(url)) as ws: await ws.send ( encode(Hello(peer_id=identity.peer_id, device_name=identity.device_name)) ) ack = decode(await ws.recv ()) if not isinstance(ack, HelloAck): raise PairError(f"expected hello_ack, got {type(ack).__name__}") return ack Every single line has issues that make this not a candidate for cli.py The cli file should deal with turning command line arguments into actions, not dealing with web-socket realities - even Codex GPT 5.5 didn't see this is a concern until I explicitly pointed to it. What's going on here? Current LLM coding tools are geared towards minimal diffs, per-line review and a strong tendency to avoid creating new files/classes. Perhaps the result of training on millions of Github issues in open source projects? My fourth attempt: I asked Codex to create more classes, but Codex went overboard and created one class too many, a PairingClient which had only one function and invisible from the outside. I have a hard time believing we can SKILL.md ourselves out this kind of behaviour with coding LLMs pre-optimized for minimal diff and both resisting and overshooting when asked to mind design principles. Another concern is my own limitation: I would not be able to verbalise every intuition I have about programming up front. #LLM #Codex #Claude

May 2026
LinkedInDeveloper Advocacy

Still buzzing from two amazing days at #ECS2026 in Cologne 🇩🇪 last week! This was my very first ECS, and getting to be there as a speaker made it even more special. I’m genuinely proud that I had the chance to present a session at an event like this 🙏 What made these days so memorable was the mix of learning, inspiration, and great conversations. I got to attend some fantastic sessions, including David Lorenzo López talk on Dataverse and Business Central, The Virtual Entity Way. Really cool to see how virtual tables can be used to connect Business Central, Dataverse, and Power Pages in such a smart way 🚀 Charles Sexton session on accessibility in Power Apps was another highlight for me. It was great to see real attention being given to such an important topic. Building accessible applications should never be an afterthought 💯 And ending the event with a session from two Dutch friends, Daniel Laskewitz and Miguel Verweij (also my travel buddy, thanks for the fun trip ❤️ ), was just awesome. It was also great to see that there is still real attention for the power of AI Builder 💪 But as always, events like this are about more than just the sessions. Catching up with familiar faces, meeting new people, sharing ideas, and having great conversations is what makes these community events so valuable. Paul Beck , it was so great to see you again and to talk about all the cool stuff you’re doing with #Playwright ! Huge thanks to everyone who made these two days so much fun. Special thanks to Adis Jugo , Mustafa Toroman ☁ , Thomas Vochten , and the rest of the organizing team for this wonderful event 🙏 Already looking forward to the next one! #ECS2026 #PowerPlatform #PowerApps #Dataverse #PowerPages #Accessibility #AIBuilder #Community

May 2026
LinkedInKubernetes

Shipped a hobby project as OSS: OpenConveyor. I wanted an easy way to kick off AI agents from my phone, or wherever I happen to be, without giving them the run of my laptop or a long-lived service account. I spend many many years working with Kubernetes, and the primitives for this already exist: Jobs, NetworkPolicies, RBAC, projected Secret volumes, Pod Security Standards. The gap was a thin layer that composes them into something you can safely point an agent at. OpenConveyor is that layer. One CRD (Task) describes the agent, the prompt, and explicitly the secrets and hosts it can reach. The controller reconciles it into a hardened, short-lived Job and cleans up after itself. Anything not declared is denied. Timeouts are mandatory, so no forever running agent going haywire. Trigger it from a GitHub issue, Linear ticket, cron, claude code or copilot session with a /conveyor command, or Telegram bot. Any agent image. Any cluster. Apache 2.0, alpha state, written in Go. Links in the comments.

Apr 2026

About this data. Royal Schiphol Group (schiphol.com). Department attribution is 40.91%; remaining activity is grouped under Others. Updated 2026-09-25T18:00:10.181Z.

Not yet computedPer-team narrative summaries