Zeer Skan AI / intent / skan-ai

Skan AI

201-500 employees·Menlo Park, California, United States·skan.ai

Observed, not inferred · updated weekly

Buying intent

76 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Sales and Support are carrying most of it.

50signals · 30 days
41topics tracked
14.29%attributed to a team

Attention by team

LinkedIn activity, by team

Where Skan AI's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.

Artificial Intelligence
Agentic AI System
Software Quality
AI Transformation
AI Agent Software
Business Model
Sales
Low25% of team Sales to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 25% of this team's signals
Low25% of team Sales to Agentic AI System: Low, 25% of this team's signals
Sales to Software Quality: no signal
Low25% of team Sales to AI Transformation: Low, 25% of this team's signals
Low25% of team Sales to AI Agent Software: Low, 25% of this team's signals
Sales to Business Model: no signal
Support
Support to Artificial Intelligence: no signal
Support to Agentic AI System: no signal
Support to Software Quality: no signal
Support to AI Transformation: no signal
Support to AI Agent Software: no signal
Low100% of team Support to Business Model: Low, 100% of this team's signals
Others
High57% of team Others to Artificial Intelligence: High, 57% of this team's signals
Low17% of team Others to Agentic AI System: Low, 17% of this team's signals
Low10% of team Others to Software Quality: Low, 10% of this team's signals
Low7% of team Others to AI Transformation: Low, 7% of this team's signals
Low7% of team Others to AI Agent Software: Low, 7% of this team's signals
Low3% of team Others to Business Model: Low, 3% of this team's signals
LowMediumHigh·  banded against the busiest pairing on this page

Topics being researched

30-day window

Every tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.

Artificial Intelligence
LinkedIn
High volume
95%
last
10d ago
Agentic AI System
LinkedIn
Medium volume
97%
last
10d ago
Software Quality
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
10d ago
AI Transformation
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
10d ago
AI Agent Software
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
10d ago
Business Model
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
19d ago
Engineering team
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
10d ago
Customer Journey
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
10d ago
Enterprise Software
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
10d ago
Cost Management
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
10d ago
Career Development
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
12d ago
CI/CD
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
10d ago
Website Performance
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
25d ago
HubSpot CMS Hub
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
25d ago
Workflow Automation
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
24d ago

Need intent for a specific topic or industry?

We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.

Talk to us

Who's active at Skan AI

verified title on file

Titles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.

Others7 active
Executiveresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
Executiveresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
VPresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
researching AI Transformation
in
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
Data Scientist
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
Directorresearching Claims Processing
in
Engineering3 active
researching WordPress themes (Design)
in
researching Google Drive
in
Sales1 active
Director of Business Development, EMEA
Directorresearching Artificial Intelligence
in
+ 1 more in Sales
Support1 active
Customer Success Manager
Senior ICresearching Business Model
in
+ 1 more in Support

See everyone, not just the first 10

12 people across every department at Skan AI, plus a LinkedIn profile link for each.

Primary products / business lines

LinkedIn company profile

Your AI agents fail without real operational context. Skan AI observes how work actually happens and turns it into the understanding your agents need to transform and automate high-impact work.

New capability sought

Employee posts (LinkedIn)

CI/CD; Career Development; Cost Management; Customer Journey; Engineering team; Enterprise Software; Software Quality

Top accounts researching Skan AI

names withheld on the public page

These are companies whose own people brought up Skan AI unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.

151,426 companies · 839,012 people are researching Artificial Intelligence

Skan AI's own team shows 18 signals on this topic. No one outside Skan AI has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.

  • Agentic AI System32,339 cos · 130,942 people
  • Software Quality1,651 cos · 5,155 people
Sign up to see which companies →

Buyer profile

company size · seniority

Company size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.

Unlock the buyer profile

Company-size breakdown and buyer seniority mix for accounts researching Skan AI.

Company size breakdown
Buyer seniority mix

Sign up to learn more

Create an account to explore buyer insights as they become available.

Sign up to learn more →

Buying committee functions

Employee job titles (LinkedIn)

Engineering — 2 people; Marketing — 2 people; Leadership — 1 person; Customer Success — 1 person; Data / Analytics — 1 person; Sales — 1 person

What's been said

public posts mentioning Skan AI

Up to 9 public excerpts naming Skan AI from the past 365 days, across LinkedIn, Reddit, X, YouTube and other public sources.

LinkedIn

𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗸𝘀. 𝗧𝘄𝗼 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. I recently spent time with our engineering and platform teams in Ottawa — Shailesh Kaul and the team who build the foundation everything else runs on. Then a few days later in Menlo Park with Manish Garg , Daniel Dantus and the agentic AI team. Different cities, completely different energy in the room. But the same thing became clear in both conversations. For more than six years, Skan AI has been pioneering something most enterprises still struggle with — understanding the true nature of work. Observing it, mapping it, surfacing what's invisible. That still matters. But somewhere in those conversations it became clear that we're crossing a line. From understanding work to doing it. Not as a tool in someone's workflow. As a participant in it. That's a different thing entirely. But what mattered most had nothing to do with the technology. It was watching people disagree well. Debates that got sharp but never personal. Disagreements that produced clarity rather than friction. Late in the day, where you could see the tiredness — and also the commitment. I've seen enough transformations fail to know this: you can scale capability with technology. You can't scale belief. That has to be built person by person, and it takes longer than any product roadmap. We're building something genuinely new at Skan. That's energising. It's also a reminder that the hardest thing we'll build isn't the platform.

May 2026
LinkedIn

"𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗼 𝗜 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁?" — 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗧𝗢 𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗜𝗡 𝟳𝟮 𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦 Recently, one of our sales leaders ran into a senior enterprise executive at a social event. Aman Rangrass , our CRO, was introduced to their partner, who had just taken on a significant role leading AI transformation at a large organization. The question was simple. "Where do I even start?" Not which model to use, or which agent framework, or questions about a demo. Simply, where do I begin, and what path do I follow? That introduction led to a conversation with Aman. 72 hours later we had an agreement in place — the fastest we’d ever moved. Two weeks later the contract was signed. The reason it moved that fast is that the question asked is one we have been building an answer to for years. Everyone is talking about digital labour, human and bot workforces, new process architectures. But very few transformation leaders have a grounded map of where AI should actually intervene in their organization, or what the economic case looks like. That is the missing starting point. Not agents. Not orchestration. Not automation at scale. A blueprint. Think of it as a floodlight across the entire organisation — detecting work patterns, identifying where AI agents can have the greatest impact, and quantifying what that impact looks like. At Skan AI we call this Skan Blueprint, and the urgency around it is coming from a new place. It is no longer just CIOs and innovation teams asking the question. It is Chief AI Officers and transformation leaders who have been handed a mandate and told: you now own AI transformation for this enterprise. And their first question is the right one. Where do I start? Show me the Blueprint.

May 2026

Leadership changes

Web / press

I'm excited to share that I've joined Skan AI as SVP of Enterprise GTM.; Exciting next chapter for Skan AI. As we enter our next phase of growth, I’m excited to be building and scaling our AI-first Professional Services organization. | Abhishek Shadangi; Better, faster, cheaper models — every enterprise team has access to them, but that doesn't have to erode your competitive edge.

M&A / partnership appetite

Web / press

Skan AI Expands Agentic AI Leadership with Acquisition of Metaculars Inc.; Skan AI Raises $63 Million to Give Enterprise AI the Context It’s Missing | Skan AI; Skan AI Partners with University of Missouri on AI Research

Regulatory exposure

Web / press

Skan AI raises $63m to watch how office staff actually work, then build agents that copy them; BigDATAwire - Data Science • AI • Advanced Analytics; Skan AI raises $63 million betting that watching how employees actually work is the missing layer of enterprise AI | VentureBeat

About this data. Skan AI (skan.ai). Department attribution is 14.29%; remaining activity is grouped under Others. Updated 2026-10-03T14:00:03.490Z.

Not yet computedPer-team narrative summaries