Zeer solo.io / intent / solo-io

solo.io

51-200 employees·Belmont, Massachusetts, United States·solo.io

Observed, not inferred · updated weekly

Buying intent

107 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Sales and Support are carrying most of it.

82signals · 30 days
40topics tracked
39.29%attributed to a team

Attention by team

LinkedIn activity, by team

Where solo.io's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.

Artificial Intelligence
Agentic AI System
Cloud-Native Security
AI Agent Software
Open Source
Kubernetes
Sales
Medium40% of team Sales to Artificial Intelligence: Medium, 40% of this team's signals
Medium40% of team Sales to Agentic AI System: Medium, 40% of this team's signals
Sales to Cloud-Native Security: no signal
Low10% of team Sales to AI Agent Software: Low, 10% of this team's signals
Sales to Open Source: no signal
Low10% of team Sales to Kubernetes: Low, 10% of this team's signals
Support
Low22% of team Support to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 22% of this team's signals
Low22% of team Support to Agentic AI System: Low, 22% of this team's signals
Medium44% of team Support to Cloud-Native Security: Medium, 44% of this team's signals
Support to AI Agent Software: no signal
Support to Open Source: no signal
Low11% of team Support to Kubernetes: Low, 11% of this team's signals
Engineering
Low50% of team Engineering to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 50% of this team's signals
Low50% of team Engineering to Agentic AI System: Low, 50% of this team's signals
Engineering to Cloud-Native Security: no signal
Engineering to AI Agent Software: no signal
Engineering to Open Source: no signal
Engineering to Kubernetes: no signal
Product
Low100% of team Product to Artificial Intelligence: Low, 100% of this team's signals
Product to Agentic AI System: no signal
Product to Cloud-Native Security: no signal
Product to AI Agent Software: no signal
Product to Open Source: no signal
Product to Kubernetes: no signal
Others
High32% of team Others to Artificial Intelligence: High, 32% of this team's signals
High24% of team Others to Agentic AI System: High, 24% of this team's signals
Low6% of team Others to Cloud-Native Security: Low, 6% of this team's signals
Medium15% of team Others to AI Agent Software: Medium, 15% of this team's signals
Medium15% of team Others to Open Source: Medium, 15% of this team's signals
Low9% of team Others to Kubernetes: Low, 9% of this team's signals
LowMediumHigh·  banded against the busiest pairing on this page

Topics being researched

30-day window

Every tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.

Artificial Intelligence
LinkedIn
High volume
94%
last
11d ago
Agentic AI System
LinkedIn
High volume
94%
last
13d ago
Cloud-Native Security
LinkedIn
Low volume
91%
last
13d ago
AI Agent Software
LinkedIn
Low volume
88%
last
11d ago
Open Source
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
13d ago
Kubernetes
LinkedIn
Low volume
87%
last
12d ago
Generative AI
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
22d ago
AI Governance
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
17d ago
AI Infrastructure
LinkedIn
Low volume
88%
last
11d ago
Enterprise Architecture
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
17d ago
Fit for purpose
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
24d ago
Control Loop
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
24d ago
Cloud Computing
LinkedIn
Low volume
83%
last
30d ago
Software Development
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
13d ago
AI Transformation
LinkedIn
Low volume
83%
last
30d ago

Need intent for a specific topic or industry?

We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.

Talk to us

Who's active at solo.io

verified title on file

Titles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.

Others4 active
Executiveresearching AI Agent Software
in
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
researching Agentic AI System
in
researching Artificial Intelligence
in
Sales2 active
Directorresearching Enterprise Architecture
in
VPresearching Line Item
in
Support2 active
Leadershipresearching Agentic AI System
in
researching Cloud-Native Security
in
Engineering1 active
Leadershipresearching Computer Science
in
Product1 active
Leadershipresearching Artificial Intelligence
in

Primary products / business lines

LinkedIn company profile

Solo.io is reimagining infrastructure for cloud and AI, uniting secure, seamless cloud connectivity with AI-ready, agentic infrastructure. Trusted by leading enterprises worldwide, Solo.io helps organizations securely connect applications, services, and AI workloads across any environment. From AI infrastructure to API gateways and service mesh, our solutions simplify and unify application net

New capability sought

Employee posts (LinkedIn)

Kubernetes; AI Agent Software; Open Source; AI Transformation; Cloud Computing; Software Development

Top accounts researching solo.io

names withheld on the public page

These are companies whose own people brought up solo.io unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.

151,426 companies · 839,012 people are researching Artificial Intelligence

solo.io's own team shows 19 signals on this topic. No one outside solo.io has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.

  • Agentic AI System32,339 cos · 130,942 people
  • Cloud-Native Security2,794 cos · 8,681 people
Sign up to see which companies →

Buyer profile

company size · seniority

Company size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.

Unlock the buyer profile

Company-size breakdown and buyer seniority mix for accounts researching solo.io.

Company size breakdown
Buyer seniority mix

Sign up to learn more

Create an account to explore buyer insights as they become available.

Sign up to learn more →

Buying committee functions

Employee job titles (LinkedIn)

Engineering — 3 people; Product — 1 person; Leadership — 1 person; Sales — 1 person

What's been said

public posts by solo.io's team

No public post naming solo.io has surfaced in the past year, so this is what solo.io's own team is posting about publicly — their topics, in their words.

LinkedIn

Service mesh started by securing microservices. Now, it's becoming the backbone for AI and agentic traffic. Enterprises are seeing new AI communication patterns: agents calling LLMs, MCP servers, and other agents. These interactions challenge many assumptions we made for traditional microservices traffic. Routing, security, and policy decisions now depend heavily on context inside the request itself. Wrote a blog about how Istio and agentgateway are evolving into an agentic mesh, with concrete examples.

May 2026
LinkedIn

Digging into the 'act' claim on token exchange (RFC 8693) and why it (by itself) needs more help: authorization attenuation, cross-boundary, channel bound tokens, and cryptographic chains. Great blog post from WorkOS describing what's missing, what work is going on in OAuth working group, and what can be done now to help: https://lnkd.in/gW8fqDc6

May 2026
LinkedInArtificial Intelligence

✅ 🤖 🔐 Interested in learning about the #AAuth protocol? I've put together a comprehensive set of end-to-end demos using AAuth, and agentgateway to implement agent identity, user delegation, authorization, and policy enforcement with detailed instructions and working code! 🪪 AAuth is a new protocol written by Dick Hardt with input from many across the industry focused on the challenges of AI agent identity, registration, delegation, user interaction, and access management. Right now it's being worked on in the #IETF through the #OAuth working group. And we are already starting to see implementations of it! AAuth eliminates bearer tokens, implements cryptographic identity, and supports a layered approach to adoption: - identity only, resource/PEP enforced policies - bootstrap that integrates with SPIFFE, WebAuthN, other.. - client/agent registration, across domains (dynamically, etc) - integration with OAuth - person-asserted delegation - mission mandates / boundary checks - cross trust-domain/boundary authorization checks 👇 Take a look at the IETF draft [1], the protocol explorer [2], and the full-working demo I've put together [3]. See all links in the comments. 🙏 #aauth #oauth #identity #mcp #modelcontextprotocol

May 2026
LinkedIn

👉 🤯 A common source of confusion when working with customers: understanding AI agent "on behalf of", OAuth, and what things look like in practice. OAuth was built for user-to-client delegation, how does that play out in the world of AI agents? Take a look at my blog post here which dives deeply into the topic: https://lnkd.in/guvpYPZ8

May 2026
LinkedIn

One of the top integrations people keep asking about: “How do we make our existing APIs usable by AI agents without rebuilding integrations from scratch?” With Agentgateway’s new OpenAPI to MCP support, teams can turn existing REST APIs into MCP tools for agents and coding assistants. AI agents can securely use the systems enterprises already have. The hard part of enterprise AI isn’t building agents, it’s securely connecting them to real business systems. https://lnkd.in/eRHBW8Bw

May 2026
LinkedInArtificial Intelligence

⚒️ 🤖 🔧 If you are connecting APIs and MCP servers to your agents in enterprise environments, 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 "𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐞" [1]. That is, MCP over stdio with piles of API keys 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐢-𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 [2]. 🤔 But not all MCP servers today are available as remote. And the ones that are, may not be that good. It makes sense to invest in a tool surface/API that is optimized for LLM/AI models. So what are teams actually doing in production today? ▪️ Wrapping existing APIs with thin MCP facades? ▪️ Translating APIs 1:1 into MCP tools? ▪️ Skipping MCP entirely and calling APIs directly? ▪️ Leaning heavily on “code mode” and local execution? 👆 I have a feeling it's the first two bullets? [1]: https://lnkd.in/gTyScmjc [2]: https://lnkd.in/gNP-PfQZ #modelcontextprotocol #mcp #api #claude #openai

May 2026
LinkedIn

Any autonomous agent worth trusting has to answer four questions. Who is this agent? What is it allowed to do, and for whom? What is it doing right now? What can we prove afterwards? Identity. Policy. Observability. Evidence. This is the model we’re building the Catalyst around. #ZeroTrustAgents #AgenticAI #TMForum #DTWIgnite2026

May 2026
LinkedIn

Running #NemoClaw (or other harnesses) on Kubernetes hasn't been that straight forward. In this video, I walk through our recently contributed support to multi-tenant, secure OpenClaw (and soon to be Hermes) running on #Kubernetes with kagent . Blog with more details in the comments!

May 2026
LinkedIn

🔥 MCP can be a bloat of a protocol when connecting to tools. But the naive way of just put all of the tools/descriptions/schemas into the context isn't the only way. Some teams have built their MCP servers to use "progressive disclosure" which only exposes a couple tools like find_tool and execute_tool, but what if you don't control the backend MCP server? Or you want to support explicit tool listing? You can wrap your MCP servers with agentgateway as a "composite" MCP server, and let agentgateway implement the progressive disclosure. How does that work? Basically, you configure your MCP servers (with no modification to them to support search/execute, etc) and let clients connect to agentgateway. Agentgateway will respond to "tools/list" with only two tools: 'get_tool' and 'invoke_tool'. The model can then decide which tools it wants the full schema for. You can combine this with a simple front matter in your prompt and reduce token bloat from MCP by at least 90% Take a look at Michael Levan recent blog post on the setup and cost savings of this approach with agentgateway https://lnkd.in/g8GbQwah #mcp #context #openai #anthropic #progressivedisclosure

May 2026

Leadership changes

Web / press

Solo.io boss: I made mistakes, and that made me a better CEO

M&A / partnership appetite

Web / press

Announcing Solo.io's Partnership with Microsoft: Expanding Access Through IP Co-sell and MACC | Solo.io; Solo’s seed funding round, supporting its groundbreaking vision for the future of the cloud | Solo.io; Solo.io Extends Agentic Governance to Any Environment with Solo Enterprise for agentgateway | Solo.io

About this data. solo.io (solo.io). Department attribution is 39.29%; remaining activity is grouped under Others. Updated 2026-10-03T14:00:03.490Z.

Not yet computedPer-team narrative summaries