Zeer Trojan Technologies / intent / trojan-technologies

Trojan Technologies

251-1K employees·London, Ontario, Canada·trojantechnologies.com

Observed, not inferred · updated weekly

Buying intent

57 tracked signals | Top 15 topics are below | Sales is carrying most of it.

45signals · 30 days
27topics tracked
100%attributed to a team

Attention by team

LinkedIn activity, by team

Where Trojan Technologies's own people are actually spending their attention, by team, by topic. Bands run Low to High against the busiest pairing on this page, and each cell also shows how much of that team's own activity it represents.

Wastewater
Artificial Intelligence
Water Management
Water Quality
Water Treatment
Advanced Manufacturing
Sales
High38% of team Sales to Wastewater: High, 38% of this team's signals
Medium24% of team Sales to Artificial Intelligence: Medium, 24% of this team's signals
Medium15% of team Sales to Water Management: Medium, 15% of this team's signals
Low12% of team Sales to Water Quality: Low, 12% of this team's signals
Low6% of team Sales to Water Treatment: Low, 6% of this team's signals
Low6% of team Sales to Advanced Manufacturing: Low, 6% of this team's signals
LowMediumHigh·  banded against the busiest pairing on this page

Topics being researched

30-day window

Every tracked topic, ranked by volume, not by our guess at what matters. Confidence is the classifier's own certainty that a signal belongs where we've filed it.

Wastewater
LinkedIn
High volume
95%
last
4d ago
Artificial Intelligence
LinkedIn
Medium volume
96%
last
4d ago
Water Management
LinkedIn
Medium volume
96%
last
9d ago
Water Quality
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
11d ago
Water Treatment
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
24d ago
Advanced Manufacturing
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
9d ago
AI Infrastructure
LinkedIn
Low volume
97%
last
14d ago
Data Center
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
9d ago
Process Control
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
24d ago
Closed-loop automation
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
4d ago
Panama Canal
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
29d ago
Incentive Program
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
24d ago
Supply Chain
LinkedIn
Low volume
92%
last
29d ago
Economic Growth
LinkedIn
Low volume
96%
last
29d ago
Scale AI
LinkedIn
Low volume
98%
last
4d ago

Need intent for a specific topic or industry?

We track the full taxonomy across every account in the graph — including themes not shown on this page.

Talk to us

Who's active at Trojan Technologies

verified title on file

Titles, seniority and topic straight from each person's own activity, with a LinkedIn link so you can check any of them yourself.

Sales3 active
Directorresearching Water Treatment
in
researching Professional Development
in
Others1 active
researching Groundwater monitoring
in

Primary products / business lines

LinkedIn company profile

Our Vision To continuously advance water treatment, ensuring everyone has access to clean water, globally. Our Mission Our passionate team provides innovative physical water treatment solutions across municipal, industrial, and residential customers ensuring the world’s water quality objectives are met. Trojan Technologies product brands include TrojanUV, Aquafine, VIQUA, AQUAFIDES, and Aria Fil

Top accounts researching Trojan Technologies

names withheld on the public page

These are companies whose own people brought up Trojan Technologies unprompted, not accounts we guessed might be interested. We can't yet tell an implementation partner from a genuine buyer here, names unlock along with the buyer profile below.

394 companies · 1,313 people are researching Wastewater

Trojan Technologies's own team shows 13 signals on this topic. No one outside Trojan Technologies has been seen researching the company by name yet — so this is the market it sits in, not a list of its buyers.

  • Artificial Intelligence129,094 cos · 649,540 people
  • Water Management1,387 cos · 4,621 people
Sign up to see which companies →

Buyer profile

company size · seniority

Company size and how senior the people involved are, the two things that decide whether this is a real deal. Competitor overlap isn't computed yet for this account.

Unlock the buyer profile

Company-size breakdown and buyer seniority mix for accounts researching Trojan Technologies.

Company size breakdown
Buyer seniority mix

Sign up to learn more

Create an account to explore buyer insights as they become available.

Sign up to learn more →

Buying committee functions

Employee job titles (LinkedIn)

Sales — 2 people; Marketing — 2 people

What's been said

public posts mentioning Trojan Technologies

Up to 9 public excerpts naming Trojan Technologies from the past 365 days, across LinkedIn, Reddit, X, YouTube and other public sources.

LinkedIn

Week 3 — Where UV Is Installed… and Why Dose Still Matters My colleague Nina Roy hosted her first webinar yesterday, great content and very engaging, and she shared something that stuck with me — the Repetition Rule: research shows people often need to see or hear a message 7 times before it sticks. This is Week 3 of this series and my 9th post on UV… so hopefully it’s starting to land 😊 And yes — it’s Thursday. Last week we discussed how UV destroys ozone at 254 nm. This week, let’s talk about where UV is placed in the system — and why that alone is not enough. 👉 Because placement defines where ozone is removed 👉 But UV dose determines whether it is actually removed In pharmaceutical water systems, UV for ozone destruction is typically installed: • After the storage tank • Before point-of-use • Upstream of sensitive processes The goal is simple: Ensure ozone is fully destroyed before it can impact product or process. 💡 But how much UV dose is actually required? This question isn’t new. Back in 2004, work led by Trojan Technologies research (Dr. Mihaela Stefan) established ozone photolysis kinetics, showing that ozone destruction follows predictable first-order behavior and defining D10 relationships across concentrations. Later, at the 2012 ISPE Annual Meeting, Philip Sumner (Pfizer) presented experimental validation work in high purity/DI water. 💧 The conclusions were interesting: • Historical guidance of ~90 mJ/cm² remains a conservative design basis • For 1 ppm ozone, testing showed only ~70 mJ/cm² was required • For ≤500 ppb ozone, doses requirement is lower than 50 mJ/cm² were sufficient 👉 So if we already understand the dose…why are we still talking about it 10+ years later? Because in real systems: • Ozone concentration is not constant • Flow conditions vary • Test methods have limitations • System design introduces variability 💡And most importantly: We are not designing for “lab conditions” — we are designing for reliable operation. In other words: Dose is not just a number — it is a design decision tied to risk. Next week: 👉 What does “non-detectable ozone” actually mean — and are we designing to the right target? #PharmaWater #UVTechnology #OzoneDestruction #ProcessEngineering #GMP #WaterTreatment #Trojantechnologies #ISPE #Risk #FDA #noaddedsubstances #PW #WFI

Apr 2026

About this data. Trojan Technologies (trojantechnologies.com). Department attribution is 100%; remaining activity is grouped under Others. Updated 2026-09-25T18:00:10.181Z.

Not yet computedPer-team narrative summaries